Leaderboard/SheetsData
MCP ServerScored via MCP protocol probing: initialize handshake, tools/list conformance, and ping + tool invocation performance.

SheetsData

Instant access to electronic component datasheets — specs, pinouts, package info, and more — extracted from manufacturer PDFs. No uploads needed. SheetsData extracts and structures data from thousands of electronic component datasheets so AI agents can look up any part's specifications in seconds. Instead of downloading PDFs and parsing tables manually, just pass a manufacturer part number (MPN) and get back structured electrical characteristics, pin configurations, absolute maximum ratings, and more. ## What you can do - **Find components** — Search across JLCPCB, Mouser, and DigiKey by part number or keyword, with real-time pricing and stock levels - **Read datasheets** — Access any section of a datasheet as structured text: pinout tables, electrical specs, register maps, timing diagrams, application circuits - **Compare parts** — Side-by-side comparison of up to 5 components with specs, pricing, and availability from multiple distributors - **Validate designs** — Check if a component will work within your operating conditions (voltage, current, temperature) against its absolute maximum ratings - **Find alternatives** — Discover substitute components with similar specs, same package, or compatible pinout when a part is unavailable or too expensive - **Analyze images** — Extract data from datasheet graphs, package drawings, and pin diagrams using vision AI ## Tools | Tool | Cost | Description | |------|------|-------------| | `search_parts` | Free | Search components by part number or keyword across JLCPCB, Mouser, and DigiKey | | `search_datasheets` | Free | Semantic search across extracted datasheets (e.g. "low-noise LDO with PSRR above 70dB") | | `prefetch_datasheets` | Free | Batch warm-up extraction for up to 20 parts (fire-and-forget) | | `check_extraction_status` | Free | Poll extraction progress after prefetch or read_datasheet | | `get_part_details` | 4¢ | Full specs, pricing, stock, and datasheet summary for a specific MPN | | `read_datasheet` | 6¢ | Read datasheet sections or semantic search within a datasheet | | `compare_parts` | 10¢ | Side-by-side comparison of 2–5 components | | `check_design_fit` | 10¢ | Validate operating conditions against datasheet limits | | `analyze_image` | 8¢ | Extract data from datasheet graphs, package drawings, and pin diagrams | | `find_alternative` | 10¢ | Find substitute components with similar specs or compatible pinout | ## Recommended workflow 1. `search_parts` to find candidates by keyword or part number 2. `get_part_details` or `compare_parts` to evaluate options 3. `read_datasheet` for detailed specs — start with `section='summary'` to get an overview and discover available sections, then fetch specific sections as needed 4. `check_design_fit` to validate against your design constraints 5. `read_datasheet` with `mode='search'` for any remaining questions about a specific part 6. `analyze_image` when you need data from a graph, package drawing, or pin diagram ## Tips - Use manufacturer part numbers (MPNs) like `TPS54302` or LCSC numbers like `C2837938` — bare values like "100nF" or "10K" are not part numbers - `search_datasheets` is best for broad spec-based discovery (e.g. "LDO with dropout below 200mV and quiescent current under 1uA") - `search_parts` is best for finding a specific part or browsing a category with pricing and stock - First extraction for a new part takes 10–20s as the PDF is downloaded and processed; subsequent calls are cached - Use `prefetch_datasheets` to warm up a batch of parts (e.g. from a BOM) before reading them individually - Prefer requesting specific sections from `read_datasheet` rather than reading everything at once to keep responses focused

50/100
Operational Score
Score Breakdown
Availability30/30
Conformance10/30
Performance10/40
Key Metrics
Uptime 30d
100.0%
P95 Latency
200.2ms
Conformance
Fail
Trend
Stable
What's Being Tested
Availability
HTTP health check to the service endpoint
Responded with HTTP 401 in 205ms
ConformanceNot tested
MCP initialize handshake + tools/list
Performance
MCP ping + zero-arg tool invocation benchmarking
P95 latency: 200ms, task completion: 0%
Recent Probe Results
TimestampStatusLatencyConformance
Apr 10, 2026success205.9msPass
Apr 10, 2026success225.7msPass
Apr 10, 2026success200.2msPass
Source Registries
smithery
First Seen
Apr 10, 2026
Last Seen
Apr 10, 2026
Last Probed
Apr 10, 2026
SheetsData — Chiark Agent Quality Index