Leaderboard/RationalBloks
MCP ServerScored via MCP protocol probing: initialize handshake, tools/list conformance, and ping + tool invocation performance.

RationalBloks

By providing a simple JSON configuration file to describe your data structure, the system generates for you: • š—™š—®š˜€š˜š—”š—£š—œ š—•š—®š—°š—øš—²š—»š—±: A full CRUD API implementation based on your JSON schema. • š—£š—¼š˜€š˜š—“š—æš—²š—¦š—¤š—Ÿ š——š—®š˜š—®š—Æš—®š˜€š—²: Production-ready, with an Alembic migration system built-in (fully trackable by Git). • š—¦š—²š—°š˜‚š—æš—¶š˜š˜†: Production-ready JWT authentication built-in. • š—–š—¹š—¼š˜‚š—± š—œš—»š—³š—æš—®š˜€š˜š—æš˜‚š—°š˜š˜‚š—æš—²: Fully managed and production-ready with built-in staging and production environments.

47/100
Operational Score
Score Breakdown
Availability27/30
Conformance10/30
Performance10/40
Key Metrics
Uptime 30d
99.9%
P95 Latency
886.4ms
Conformance
Fail
Trend
Stable
What's Being Tested
Availability
HTTP health check to the service endpoint
Responded with HTTP 401 in 232ms
ConformanceNot tested
MCP initialize handshake + tools/list
Performance
MCP ping + zero-arg tool invocation benchmarking
P95 latency: 886ms, task completion: 0%
Recent Probe Results
TimestampStatusLatencyConformance
Apr 16, 2026success232.3msPass
Apr 16, 2026success212.5msPass
Apr 16, 2026success206.3msPass
Apr 16, 2026success251.6msPass
Apr 16, 2026success208msPass
Apr 16, 2026success243.9msPass
Apr 16, 2026success230.7msPass
Apr 16, 2026success227.5msPass
Apr 16, 2026success8150.2msPass
Apr 16, 2026success354.2msPass
Source Registries
smithery
First Seen
Mar 26, 2026
Last Seen
Apr 18, 2026
Last Probed
Apr 16, 2026